J2EE vs .NET
Posted By: Roger Borg on June 15, 2001 in response to this message.
>Here's another comparison (DotNet Vs J2EE) from the DotNet Side !!
>http://www.objectwatch.com/FinalJ2EEandDotNet.doc
Why can't the 'Scalability' section of this document, also include the other possible 'real world' hardware/software selections when considering J2EE?
-> WINTEL
-> LINTEL
I would consider this section of the document incomplete for the purposes of serious comparison.
If there are glaring performance/scalability issues with J2EE on either of these platforms, Roger Sessions could have played that to the hilt...
Are there any benchmarks or 'educated' guessworks comparing J2EE and MS/.NET that use the same hardware (and maybe even using NT/2000)?
0 replies in this thread Reply
J2EE vs .NET
Posted By: m m on June 15, 2001 in response to this message.
.Net applications exist actually (june 2001) , yes there are still in beta version but they exit.
You will see on September the power of .Net and the java killer : C#
0 replies in this thread Reply
J2EE vs .NET
Posted By: K George on June 16, 2001 in response to this message.
I don't agree that the M$ and $UN are equal evils at least from a developers perspective.To me key issue is that in the final analysis MS makes its $ from software Sun makes it moolah from hardware. Eventually when you apply Darwinian logic to it MS can only grow(when you consider its market cap) by taking marketshare from other people in the software market place by pushing as many commoditized solutions into the market(including niche but highly profitable markets like telecoms, embedded systems, games etc). As long as they own the platform there is nothing people can do about it. I think every one on this forum knows the history(and the bodies :-)). The ISVs already know and understand this(I work for one), hence their enthusiasm for J2EE. Personally speaking as a individual developer I know I'm at the bottom of the food chain but eventually MS is going come for me and charge me gatekeeper fees. I know this is paranoid but I'm great fan of Andy Grove's dictum that "Only the paranoid survive." So I'd rather play with my enemy's enemy right now.
Other than that I agree with most of the forum that J2EE is really great architecure with poor GUI development(esp. integration) tools.
MS really kicks ass when it comes to providing an out of the box integrated development environment.
2 replies in this thread Reply
J2EE vs .NET
Posted By: Claude Bernard Diesse on June 21, 2001 in response to this message.
I am very surprised to see that so skilled guys as you continue to confuse about who is who in this computer and IT business. Is M$ more evil than $un or Oracle$ or Ibm$ ? That is a lost-time debate... But I want to share my today conviction:
1- All are Devils until they realize you have understood their real intend !!! (to sell shit at the highest price). And non one is better in that game.
